A senior lawyer, fluent in AI, sits with your team on its live matters.
For a defined period, they set up and run the AI part of the work on your team's matters and show your people how as they go. Your lawyers keep the judgment and sign.
Why adoption follows a peer and not a programme.
A team changes how it works when someone beside the matter does it differently, in front of them, on live work.
The people on your team with the standing to lead it cannot spare the time to work out new patterns while carrying a full caseload. So the change waits.
How it works
They join the team
On the matters already running, for a defined period, beside the deal team or the practice group.
They run the AI part of the work
A due diligence run, a first draft, a review cycle. Your lawyers review it and sign, as they do today.
They show the team as they go
Senior lawyers learn from another senior lawyer, and the rest of the team learns on live matters. Nobody leaves the work to be trained.
They write it down and hand it over
The workflows and prompts that worked, and the people on your team coached to carry them on.
What you get
A senior lawyer beside your matters
For the length of the engagement, on the work your team already has.
Matters worked the new way
Live files your team ran with AI, to point to when someone asks what the tools changed.
The patterns, written down
Workflows and prompts your team keeps.
Champions on your team
Named, coached, and carrying it on after we leave.
Frequently asked questions
Does the lawyer take on our matters?
No. Your lawyers keep the judgment, review the work and sign, as they do today. Ours sits beside the matter and runs the AI part of it, so your team sees how it is done on its own files.
Isn't this expensive for a lawyer we cannot bill to a client?
Measure it against what the practice does with AI after the engagement, on every matter it runs.
Can't one of our own partners lead this?
If one has the fluency and can step back from client work to do it, yes, and we would rather work with them than instead of them. Few have both.
Doesn't the platform vendor offer onboarding?
Take it. It teaches the product. What it cannot do is sit in your data room on a live deal and show where the tool helps in your own due diligence.
How is this different from the Embedded AI Builder?
The Embedded AI Builder joins your technology team and ships software. The Embedded AI Lawyer joins the practice and works beside its matters. The two can run at the same time.
More in this track
Tell us which team wants to move and cannot spare the time.
If nobody knows yet where AI would help that team, a Practice Assessment finds out first, and we say so before anyone joins.